Learn how non-acquaintance with new e-mail notice procedures led to the denial of opportunity to the assessee in the Venugopal Reddy Yeravally vs. ITO case, as ITAT Hyderabad sets aside the ex-parte order.
In the cases related to Sunder Lal vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi) for AY 2011-12 and 2012-13, the ITAT directs re-adjudication due to lack of effective representation and challenges to additions.
In the case of Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. ACIT, ITAT Delhi rules that no disallowance can be made for delay in EPF payment due to technical issues.
In the case of J.R. Rice India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, ITAT Delhi removes Income Tax addition under section 68 for cash deposits during demonetization, citing no abnormal sales.
Delhi High Court’s ruling in favor of PepsiCo India: Late deposit of employee’s PF due to a national holiday is permissible. Detailed analysis of the judgment.
CESTAT Hyderabad reduces the penalty for Sriram Srinivasa Rao, highlighting the case of gross negligence rather than collusion in the Customs Act 1962
Assessee has appealed against an order passed by CIT(A) and subsequent addition. Learn more about Capital Gain cannot be treated as bogus without giving reasons.
Madras HC sets aside cryptic assessment order ignoring assessee’s contentions. Learn details about the case of Gemini Film Circuit and importance of adhering to principles of natural justice.
CESTAT Chandigarh allows the refund of service tax on specified services, including Terminal Handling Services, in favor of Matrix Clothing Private Ltd
CESTAT Kolkata held that when buyer and seller are not related and the price is the sole consideration, the transaction value at the time and place of export will be the assessable value. Accordingly, customs duty paid at higher assessable value is directed to be refunded.
