The CESTAT Ahmedabad addresses a case involving a refund dispute related to abatement and excise duty, emphasizing the need for clear evidence and transparency.
Explore the case of Shyam Sel And Power Limited vs. State of U.P. in Allahabad High Court. The verdict emphasizes the role of intent in invoking CGST Act provisions.
ITAT Delhi’s decision regarding applicability of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) to companies before April 1, 2017 in case of Rhythm Polymers Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT.
Madras High Court rules on SEBI penalty case, stating that incorrect PAN doesn’t exempt payment of interest. Legal analysis of the case provided.
Read about the CESTAT Hyderabad decision in Shriram Life Insurance vs. Commissioner of Customs case. CESTAT quashes service tax demand, citing Section 73(3) of the Finance Act.
Kerala High Court’s judgment on the Great Win Exports vs. Commissioner of Customs case, directing IGST refund for exported items. Learn the details here.
Ansil Ibrahim fails to prove ITC claim: HC Dismisses Writ Petition. Kerala High Court judges the denial of input tax credit under the CGST and SGST Acts. Read more about the case.
ITAT’s decision on Rounak Farms Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT case where a section 69B addition was upheld due to the appellant’s non-appearance despite 20 notices.
Read about the ITAT Pune’s decision in Kirti Bipin Thorat vs. ITO case for A.Y. 2014-15, where additions on unaccounted cash income from share sales were upheld.
Nayagi Fireworks Ltd. vs. ACIT case, where cash deposits of Rs. 99.50 Lacs were disputed and ITAT provides an opportunity to substantiate source.
