Allahabad High Court ruling: In original proceedings, the burden to prove claimed concessions is on the assessee; it shifts to the department in reassessment. Analysis.
Delhi High Court ruling: Commissioner/Appellate Authority cannot condone Customs Act appeal delay beyond 30 days. Analysis of Section 5 of Limitation Act.
CESTAT Kolkata’s order regarding the penalty imposed on CHA M/s United Custom House Agency for their alleged role in improper export overvaluation.
CESTAT Hyderabad’s ruling on CENVAT credit reversal for a polyester spun yarn manufacturer and the use of Rule 6(3) in central excise regulations.
CESTAT Kolkata quashes penalty in a service tax case related to testing, inspection, and certification services due to a limitation issue.
CESTAT Kolkata dismisses an appeal as it was filed beyond the condonable period specified by Section 128 of the Customs Act. Learn more about the case.
Allahabad High Court addresses Income Tax Act, reaffirming that appealable orders must be pursued before invoking writ jurisdiction. Learn more.
CESTAT Bangalore’s recent decision on CENVAT credit for banking and financial services in property rentals. Detailed analysis and implications of the case.
ITAT Mumbai’s recent decision on advance income tax treatment. Explore the case between ITO and Nayak Chaudhari Construction Pvt. Ltd. and its implications.
Case of ITO Vs. Iris Products Pvt. Ltd. where ITAT Ahmedabad permits Assessee Company to fund a Director’s post-graduate education for business benefit.
