Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in Kailash Judhistir Sahu vs. CIT, where the addition from 12.5% to 6% for inability to produce parties of bogus purchases is restricted.
CESTAT Kolkata held that fabric containing both Cotton and polyester in the ratio of 79.2% and 16.8% respectively is rightly classifiable under the CTH 52113190 as Cotton Polyester fabric. Accordingly, demand of differential duty of customs set aside.
Madras High Court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer since Assessing Officer failed to consider the reply/ objections made by the petitioner. Passing of order without considering the reply/objection results into non-speaking order.
CESTAT Bangalore held that various processes i.e. blackening, buffing, final inspection, packing etc. carried out on the inputs results into manufacture. Accordingly, CENVAT Credit on duty paid on inputs is admissible.
CESTAT Bangalore held that admission/ enrolment fee collected from prospective members of the club cannot be subjected to levy of service tax under the category of ‘Club or Membership Association Services’. Accordingly, demand of service tax set aside.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that Travel Agency Service, AMC Photocopy Machines and Broadband services used for the purpose of business and not for any personal use is eligible for CENVAT Credit.
Mr Sujeet Singh Hussain, in whose name M/s Madhu Enterprises was registered, had stated that he was working as a security guard in the office of present applicants, who got his signatures for opening the bank account and fraudulently got the firm registered in his name as well as other employees.
Services rendered by the respondents to M/s SB Plc, UK constitute export of service as the services were utilized by a company situated outside India and used outside India and the principal was located outside India with whom there was contract of service and such principal had paid for such services to the respondent in convertible foreign exchange.
Addition under Section 153A could not be made in the absence of incriminating material found during the course of a search conducted under Section 132. In case no incriminating material was unearthed during the search, AO could not reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments.
Bombay High Court acquits CA Gordhanbhai Madhabhai Savalia, citing inordinate delay, lack of evidence, and legal complexities in professional misconduct case.
