Penalty u/s 112 (a) against CHA on clearance of imported vessel was not leviable as the duty of the importer was to give the correct and detailed description which had been discharged and the charge of misclassification had been dropped against importing firm and the matter already been decided in favour of the importing firm and its director and therefore, the cause of imposing penalty against Custom House Clearing Agent get extinguishable.
CESTAT Kolkata held that the imported assemblies, sub-assemblies, components, sub-components under EPCG are held as allowed as spares under the Foreign Trade Policy at Para 9.57.
ITAT Mumbai held that once only comparable as chosen by DRP fails, then same loses the comparability for determining the ALP.
CESTAT Chennai held that Armour Panels and Stretcher Assembly which are parts of helicopters are eligible for exemption based on exemption certificate issued in terms of Notification No. 63/1995-CE dated 16.03.1995.
Legal process of restoring struck-off companies by NCLT. Learn about appeals, defenses, and the cost implications in the restoration of company names.
ITAT Hyderabad ruling on CIT(A) requirements, reasons for deletion of additions, and appeal filed by Revenue against Bharat Auto Tech Private Limited.
ITAT Delhi upholds deletion of Rs. 1.75 Cr disallowance, clerical error in ITR. Full order details of ITO vs. Roshan Lal Sharma for AY 2011-12 & 2012-13.
In the PCIT vs. Madhu Gupta case, Delhi HC emphasizes the necessity of a properly served notice under Section 148 for triggering reassessment proceedings.
CESTAT Chennai grants unconditional exemption to Sun Pharmaceuticals on ‘Danazol’ from excise duty. Full details of the order against Commissioner of GST & Central Excise.
Delhi High Court supports ITAT decision to delete disallowance of engineering fees, citing no material basis for discrediting debit notes. Get insights on CIT vs Cobra Instalaciones Y Servicios S.A.
