CESTAT Kolkata held that processing fee, transfer fee, administrative charges, etc. collected from land allottees as fixed by IDCO are statutory in nature. Accordingly, service tax is not leviable on the same.
CESTAT Bangalore held that rule 11 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 will be applicable for determination of assessable value of goods manufactured on job work basis.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that no reliance can be placed on statements of third party without tangible corroborative evidence. Accordingly, recovery of Cenvat Credit under rule 14 rightly dropped.
The present appeal has been filed by the revenue against order passed by the CIT(A) challenging action of CIT(A) in allowing carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 19,89,09,661/- pertaining to A.Y.s 1997-98 to 2000-01 for set off without any time limit.
Bombay High Court held that amount received as per arbitration award by the appellant pursuant to a family arrangement is not chargeable to tax.
Madras High Court held that assessment after expiry of three years is barred by limitation as per section 8 of the Tamil Nadu Tax Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 (Entry Tax Act) even if return is not filed u/s 7.
Explore Delhi HC judgment in PCIT vs. Fujitsu India Ltd. for AY 2011-14, focusing on Transfer Pricing Method. Analysis of TNMM vs. RPM with key findings. Insights and conclusion provided.
Delhi HC rules in PCIT vs Hike Pvt Ltd, clarifying tech expenses as revenue expenditure. Detailed analysis on re-characterization, AO approach, and key findings.
Delhi HC judgment on Gudwala And Sons vs. ACIT for AY 2019-20. Detailed analysis of reassessment proceedings, allegations, and flaws in AO’s approach.
ITAT Hyderabad held that where the date of agreement fixing the amount of consideration and the date of registration of property is different, value adopted by stamp valuation authority on the date of agreement has to be taken for purposes of computing full value of consideration of such transfer.
