CESTAT Mumbai held that forfeiture of security deposit justified as Customs Broker failed to act in a proactive manner in fulfilling their obligation as Customs Broker, particularly when the import documents were obtained from the importers through an intermediary.
CESTAT Mumbai held that revocation of Customs Broker license unjustified as punishment suffered by being out of Customs broker business for about two years is enough to mitigate case of violations or contraventions of CBLR, 2018.
Explore the recent Madras High Court ruling on GST Registration dispute involving Gopal Selvam. Details on the grounds, court’s view, and implications for businesses.
Neither the applicability of the legal provisions particularly with reference to the Arms Act and the Rules and various notifications had been considered nor any reasoning had been given with reference thereto, therefore, CESTAT quashed the Customs duty demand on the import of antique finished rifles with a direction to the appellate authority to consider the appeal and decide the same giving proper and substantive reasoning in support thereof.
Since assessee was not having any evidence even to prove the said fact that he had made the payment towards installment of loan for the muddamal vehicle, the Magistrate had to verify the aspect of ownership of the muddamal vehicle after conducting inquiry and should handover the custody of the muddamal vehicle at the end of the trial if assessee was able to prove his better title and possession over respondent without being influenced by any of the observations made by Revisional Court in Criminal Revision Application.
ITAT Mumbai held that additional evidences submitted contesting that sales promotion expenses are not hit by the Medical Council Regulations. Accordingly, matter set aside for fresh examination as such additional evidences require examination at the end of AO.
Pelican Tobacco Co. Ltd. appeals against CESAT’s jurisdiction in Punjab and Haryana High Court. Analysis of non-compliance with deposit orders and legal process misuse.
CESTAT Kolkata rules that procedural lapses shouldn’t obstruct substantive customs duty benefits. Case analysis of Softel Overseas Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs.
SP Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata) Suspension of Customs Broker Licence not warranted if appellant not deliberately classified the goods to evade payment of duty
The case of BMW India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (UOI) and others, as heard in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, revolves around the imposition of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on amounts reimbursed to overseas entities for services rendered.
