Competition Commission of India dismisses the case against Air India. Learn why the allegations lacked evidence of cartelization or bid-rigging, leading to the dismissal.
Rajasthan High Court grants bail to Mohit Sharma in a case involving 73 fake firms and Rs. 73.54 Crore ITC transaction. Analysis of the legal proceedings and factors considered.
High Court held that provision contained in Section 16(4) of CGST Act is violative of neither Article 14 of Constitution nor Articles 19(1)(g) & 300A of Constitution
Patna High Court directs AO to reconsider interest charges in SYV Motors vs. State of Bihar under GST, citing retrospective amendment to Section 50.
Service of notice for cancellation of GST registration through e-portal only without physical means was not valid as assessee could not open the e- Portal, due to cancellation of their GST registration and the respondent could expect assessee to know of the issuance of show cause notice or any other communications which were sent through e-Portal.
Calcutta High Court held that registered person is entitled to Input Tax Credit only if conditions prescribed u/s. 16(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 are fulfilled. It includes time limit imposed via section 16(4). Accordingly, held that section 16(4) is not violative of Article 300A of the Constitution of India.
Bombay High Court held that department should permit to correct any bonafide, inadvertent error incurred while furnishing details in Form GSTR-1 particularly when department is aware that there is no loss of revenue.
Jaipur Smart City Limited (JSCL) are covered under Governmental Authority as defined in the explanation to clause (16) of Section 2 of the IGST Act, 2017. The appellant are liable to pay GST on recovery of road cutting charges from M/s JSCL @18% (i.e. 9% CGST + 9% SGST.
Madras High Court dismisses a writ petition, emphasizing that a show cause notice is not a denial of hearing. Get insights on the case – Lakshmi Jalladianpettai Lakshmanan Vs ITO
Explore the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on whether a nominee of shares holds absolute ownership or is subject to succession laws under the Companies Act and Indian Succession Act
