The HC, in its judgment, expressed dissatisfaction with the substantial time gap between the petitioner’s hearing and the issuance of the impugned order. The court held that the order was liable to be set aside considering this time lag. Additionally, it emphasized that the officer who passed the order had not heard the petitioner, raising concerns about procedural fairness.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Delhi order on C. L. International vs Commissioner of Customs. Analysis of mis-declaration of Maida as Wheat for MEIS benefit.
Madhya Pradesh HC criticizes withholding 10% pension in Basant Raikwar vs Commercial Tax Secretary. Full judgment analysis and implications
Delhi High Court directs GST registration restoration after physical verification for Roxy Enterprises as Appellant not able to intimate change of Address due to GST Registration Cancellation
Explore the Kerala High Court’s judgment on IBS Software’s plea for immunity under Section 270AA of the Income Tax Act. Detailed analysis of the rejection and legal implications.
Read the full text of the Madras High Court judgment quashing the GST order for GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch due to lack of opportunity. Learn about the legal battle, proceedings, and implications.
Allahabad High Court overturns GST cancellation order against Manikya Engineers, citing lack of hearing. Full judgment analysis and implications revealed in this legal update.
CESTAT Bangalore held that Reflective Glass not found in notification no. 4/2009 dated 06.01.2009 is not exempt from levy of anti-dumping duty. Thus, anti-dumping duty leviable on reflective glass imported from China.
CAAR ruled that transaction involving four parties would get covered in scope of third country invoicing under ASEAN India FTA and hence become eligible for availing concessional benefit in India, if otherwise in order.
Explore the case of Pr. CIT vs Ansal Properties: Penalty notice invalidated due to ambiguity in specifying Section 271(1)(c) limb for penalty proceedings.
