Delhi High Court rules in Varyam Dass Khurana case that GST registration cancellation should be retrospective only from the date no business is conducted. Analysis of the judgment.
In case of M. Venkataraj vs Assistant Commissioner, Madras High Court instructs Revenue Department to promptly process GST rectification application within three months.
Department was directed to release the confiscated Areca Nut on condition specified as it were confiscated due to non-submission of E waybill. The bench modified the conditions imposed by the Single Judge.
CESTAT Kolkata in the matter of valuation of iron ore held that inordinate delay in testing the sample is virtually suicidal to the outcome of the test results. Hence, valuation set aside.
Delhi High Court held that the consideration received in terms of Strategic Oversight Services Agreements (SOSA) cannot be termed as Royalty under Article 12 of the DTAA even if extensive services are rendered which includes access to written knowledge, processes, and commercial information in furtherance of the services.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that an appellate authority can exercise the power u/s. 251(1)(a) to enhance the assessment only after giving a notice for enhancement. Accordingly, enhancement by CIT(A) without issuance of notice is untenable in law.
Explore the CESTAT Delhi ruling on the levy of Clean Energy Cess on coal closing stock as of June 30, 2017, its implications, and the decisive factors involved.
Directorate of Enforcement cannot sit over the seized assets, and the failure to release them is a violation of Section 132B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, applicable under Section 37(3) of FEMA, 1999. Harish Forex Services Pvt. Limited Vs Assistant Director Of Enforcement (Rajasthan High Court)
ead about the Rajasthan High Court’s decision quashing an income tax notice under Section 148A for being barred by limitation. Case details of Bijendra Singh vs ITO.
In a landmark judgment, Supreme Court rules against adverse possession claims by tenants. Detailed analysis of Brij Narayan Shukla vs. Sudesh Kumar case.
