Read case of Monarch & Qureshi Builders challenging an ITAT Mumbai order, highlighting jurisdictional issues in Section 143(2) notice for quashing assessment.
The Bombay High Court recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of New India Assurance Company Limited Vs ACIT, reshaping the landscape of tax law.
Read the full text of CESTAT Kolkata’s order on the Commissioner of Customs vs. Sawetri Trading Company case. Analysis reveals key factors influencing customs duty demand on Poppy Seeds.
Delhi High Court ruling on PCIT vs Trojan Developers Pvt. Ltd. AO’s enquiry on high premium shares and HC’s critique of Section 263 exercise. Full text of judgment.
Delhi High Court quashes the cancellation of GST registration for Radhey Trading Company, citing insufficient details in the show cause notice and retrospective cancellation order.
Read ITAT decision on the eligibility of a cooperative society for a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The case, Keyyur Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs ITO, addresses interest income on investments in a cooperative bank without a banking license.
HC court upheld factual findings of lower authorities, emphasizing its limited jurisdiction under Section 260A of Income Tax Act. It clarified that it cannot reevaluate questions of fact in the absence of any grounds alleging perversity in the findings.
ITAT Chennai’s in Ethiraj Hotel Mart Vs DCIT held that as assessee declared excess stock as business income and provided a plausible explanation for its source, it should be taxed as ‘normal business income’ and not as ‘unexplained investment’ under section 69B.
Madras High Court Directs Timely Processing of Refund granted under section 5(2) of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in Writ Petition: Muthukumaran Rangarajan Vs ITO
Read the Madras High Court’s recent ruling in Voora Property Developers Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT, challenging the Assessment Order dated 08.09.2022 for Assessment Year 2020-21. The court highlighted the failure to consider the petitioner’s response, directing a fresh assessment within four months.
