Explore the ITAT Chennai order in Rangasamy Rajaram Vs ACIT case, where revision proceedings were upheld, impacting capital gains assessment on property sale.
Madhya Pradesh High Court’s decision on writ against Section 148 reassessment notice in Amrit Homes Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT. Understand legal nuances and implications.
Karnataka High Court revolved around Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in case of Shashikala Jayaram vs. Appayappa – can cheque issued by spouse be prosecutable?
Income earned from educational activities is eligible for exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Kolkata ruling in the case of Durgapur Society of Management Science vs ITO.
Read the detailed analysis of Calcutta High Court’s judgment in Arvind Gupta vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue State Taxes, affirming GST Appellate Authority’s discretion to condone appeal delays beyond four months. Explore the implications and legal considerations.
Allahabad High Court’s judgment condoning 1365 days delay in a tax appeal, analyzing reasons and legal justifications. Key insights on delay condonation in tax cases.
Read the full text of Bombay High Court’s judgment quashing the notice under Section 148 for AY 2016-17 in Vardhaman vs. ITO case. Analysis and implications discussed.
The appellant’s claim of facing technical glitches in generating Form 26A was acknowledged, leading to the tribunal directing a fresh adjudication.
The assessee company having its business of builders and property developers, following mercantile system of accounting, filed its return of income on 30.09.2013 disclosing income at Rs.2,86,000/- after claiming deduction of Rs.4,03,40,492/-u/s. 80IB(10) of the Act.
Milap Shah vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) – 1190 days delay appeal due to medical reasons. ITAT remands income escapement notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act for detailed adjudication.
