NCLT Mumbai held that resolution plan of Saturn Rings and Forgings Private Limited submitted by S. Gopalkrishnan meeting the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and Regulations 37, 38, 38 (1A) and 39 (4) of the Regulations is approved.
NCLAT New Delhi held that Optionally Convertible Debentures (OCDs) are the financial debt within the meaning of section 5(8)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Accordingly, application filed u/s. 7 admissible.
CESTAT Chennai held that a decision on classification cannot be made merely because the goods are mentioned as ‘Food Supplement’ by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Since ingredient of product clearly shows that they have oils of fish, the product is rightly classifiable under CTH 1504 20 20.
In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court cancels the condition of an extra deposit for stay continuation in Sambhu Prasad Agarwal’s tax evasion case. Full analysis here.
In a recent judgment, Calcutta High Court resolves a Customs dispute, allowing Dredging Corporation of India Limited a refund. The court analyzes the application of Customs Act provisions and questions of unjust enrichment.
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Chennai order in the case of ST Engineering Electronics Ltd. vs ACIT regarding taxable contract income, addressing issues of revenue recognition and accounting standards.
Delhi High Court judgment on quashing ED complaint (CC no.01/2011) under PMLA against Jeevan Kumar after his acquittal in the predicate offence. Legal analysis and implications.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi’s order in Cameron (Singapore) vs ACIT case. Learn why management support fees are not considered FTS under India-Singapore DTAA. Get insights on grounds, TDS credit, interest, and penalty.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order on American Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. JCIT. The decision grants relief on relocation expenses under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order in the Ashwin Kapur vs ACIT case. The ITAT directs the AO to allow the indexed cost of improvement and recompute capital gains under section 48 of the Income Tax Act.
