Kerala High Court dismisses Jibu John’s writ petition challenging assessment reopening under Section 147 for income exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs.
CESTAT Chennai quashes customs duty demand against Blue Mount Textiles, citing issuance of show cause notice beyond the normal time limit.
Kerala High Court directs Ochanthuruth Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. to avail appellate remedies against the assessment order under the KGST Act.
Kerala High Court rules that an income tax assessment order passed on an old PAN is appealable even if a new PAN is issued, provided the old PAN is active.
In the case of American Express Services India Ltd. Vs DCIT, Delhi ITAT remits the matter for correct market segment selection, following earlier order. Full text of the ITAT Delhi order included.
Mumbai ITAT quashes penalty in DCIT vs Sasan Power Ltd case, ruling that furnishing inaccurate expenditure claim does not constitute inaccurate particulars of income, citing bona fide mistake.
ITAT Mumbai decides on a case involving the disallowance of Section 35-AC deduction, emphasizing the importance of tangible evidence over mere allegations.
Analysis of Leelaben Kantilal Parekh Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) case discussing the validity of a reopening notice under section 148 and addition under section 69C for bogus purchases.
ITAT Delhi held that AO is not justified in adding unsecured loan received u/s. 68 as AO has rejected the evidences furnished by the appellant without establishing falsity of the documents. Further, documents duly proved identities and source of investors.
ITAT Mumbai held that initiation of reassessment proceedings on account of change of opinion formed on re-appraisal of the facts already on record and examined during the regular assessment proceedings is liable to be quashed.
