In the case of Aashish Luthra vs. ITO, ITAT Mumbai deletes cash deposit addition after establishing the source as property sale advance received by the father.
Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, without any fresh and tangible material, merely on the basis of change of opinion is unsustainable in law.
CESTAT Delhi held that miscellaneous services rendered by air travel agent like planning travel itinerary of clients, etc. are covered within the ambit of Air Travel Agent and cannot be classified under Business Support Service.
Explore the case of Shantabai Jasraj Lodha challenging additions made by CIT(A) – NFAC regarding a Rs.20 lakhs deposit during demonetization. Analysis reveals discrepancies and remand for further verification.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on the eligibility of management service fees paid to non-resident AEs under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act in the case of Iris Worldwide Integrated Marketing Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT.
Read the full text of the order of ITAT Bangalore in Ambika Ghorpade Vs ACIT case, discussing disallowance u/s 14A of Income Tax Act and expenses under section 37(1).
Ahmedabad ITAT quashes Sec 263 order in Soham Buildcon vs PCIT-3 case, citing absence of twin conditions for exercising power under the provision. Full text analysis provided.
Kerala HC directs Income Tax Department to halt recovery proceedings until disposal of stay petition in Koothery Narayanan Vijayan’s case against assessment order.
Delhi ITAT ruling on Manish Kumar Mittal Vs ITO case clarifies treatment of cash-in-hand from business profits declared under Sec 44AD, preventing it from being added as unexplained money.
In Gujarat Guardian Ltd Vs C.C.E-Bharuch, CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that remuneration paid as commission to whole-time directors based on profit doesn’t constitute an employer-employee relationship, thus no service tax applies.
