The central question raised was whether the Assessee could claim exemption under Section 10(38) after initially not doing so during the assessment proceedings.
Supreme Court held that subject to statutory stipulation, a repealed provision ceased to operate from the date of repeal, and the substituted provision started operating as and when it is substituted.
Allahabad High Court ruling clarifies that pre-deposit condition for CEA appeals cannot be waived in writ jurisdiction, citing precedents and legal analysis.
Read the full text of the order from ITAT Chennai dismissing the appeal due to unexplained 726-day delay. Detailed analysis and implications provided.
Read the detailed analysis of Union Bank of India’s case vs ITO where ITAT Chennai grants deduction under Section 80P for dividends from cooperative bank shares.
In ITO Vs Saivi Finance Pvt Ltd, ITAT Delhi restores the matter back to AO due to denial of natural justice, assessees not given chance to cross-examine persons whose statements were used against them.
Explore how the Bombay High Court ruled against reopening Section 143(1) assessments without valid reasons, safeguarding taxpayers’ rights. Detailed analysis and implications.
Explore Supreme Court of India’s tests for granting interim injunctions/stay orders, highlighting three-fold test, additional factors, and balance between free speech and reputation.
SC allows Exclusion of Time spent bonafidely and diligently and in good faith before wrong forum under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act: Purni Devi Vs Babu Ram
Explore a detailed legal analysis of the Union of India vs. Jahangir Byramji Jeejeebhoy case, where the Supreme Court considers condoning a 12-year delay in filing a restoration application.
