Compensation by its very nature, had to be just. For suffering, no part of which was the claimant-appellant’s own fault, she had been awarded a sum which could, at best, be described as ‘paltry’. In regard to the application of the Eggshell-Skull Rule, the impugned judgment was silent as to how this rule applied to the present case.
Mukul Islam Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue (Calcutta High Court) The Calcutta High Court recently delivered a judgment in the case of Mukul Islam versus Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, pertaining to a writ petition challenging the refusal to condone delay in maintaining an appeal under Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax […]
ITO Vs Avirook Sen (ITAT Delhi) The case of ITO Vs Avirook Sen (ITAT Delhi) revolves around the taxation of voluntary ex-gratia compensation paid by an employer to an employee after termination from service. The Revenue contested the deletion of an addition of Rs. 2,13,08,444/- by the CIT(A). The crux of the dispute lies in […]
Discover the Bombay High Court’s ruling in the case of Netcore Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., where the rejection order of a refund claim was set aside due to procedural irregularities.
In DCIT vs. CDS Infra Projects Limited, ITAT Delhi ruled no addition under section 68 of Income Tax Act if proper evidence for source of share capital subscription is submitted.
Analysis of ITAT Delhi’s ruling in DCIT vs. Sandeep Hooda clarifies conditions for Income Tax Act 1961 Section 54 deduction eligibility in absence of basic amenities.
Read about Madras High Court ruling in Sri Krishna Textile Mills vs. Assistant Commissioner, highlighting rejection of refund on inverted turnover mismatch with GST returns.
Allahabad High Court sets aside order as petitioner wasn’t required to check GST portal for notices. Read the detailed analysis of Chemsilk Commerce Pvt Ltd Vs State of U.P. case.
Discover ITAT Kolkata ruling in Deep Jyoti Wax Traders Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO, highlighting the importance of assessee chosen valuation method under Rule 11UA(2).
Dive into the CESTAT Kolkata ruling on CENVAT credit dispute between Commissioner of Central Excise and Viraj Steel regarding steel items usage.
