ITAT Delhi held that interest income on income tax refund is chargeable at the rate of 10% as per Article 11 of India – Japan tax treaty.
ITAT Mumbai held that CPC (Centralised Processing Centre) is not authorized to carry out adjustments for disallowance of deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chennai held that simply because there are coconut trees on the land it doesnot mean that agricultural operations are carried out. Accordingly, deduction claimed under section 54B on sale of the land is disallowed.
ITAT Jabalpur held that as per the sale deed what was purchased was only a plot of land for construction of residential house. However, in absence of construction of residential house thereon, exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act not admissible.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that depreciation on licenses software is allowable at the rate of 60% and not at the rate of 25% as alleged by the revenue.
ITAT Mumbai held that issuance of draft assessment order along with the demand notice is in violation of provisions of section 144C of the Income Tax Act and hence bad in law.
The applicant does not undertake any value addition on the goods. It earns a margin of 3% while trading imported goods. The assessable value for payment of customs duties has been determined by the applicant as the sum of price at which the goods are sold by Ingrasys Singapore to the applicant plus freight. It may be noted that such freight is directly met by ADSPL.
In re Wholesome Essentials (CAAR Delhi) CAAR consider that application has been submitted, seeking ruling on the questions that (i) Dried Black Currant (subject goods) is classifiable under HS code 08062010; and (ii) the subject goods are eligible to be covered under Sr. No. 32 of Notification 50/2017-Cus., dated 30.06.2017. I notice that the applicant […]
HC quashed demand order passed by Revenue Department, on the grounds that reply filed by assessee to SCN was not considered even though the same was received by Revenue Department.
n this case addition was made u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D by AO and confirmed by CIT (A) holding that Amendment in Finance Act, 2022 in relation to disallowance u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D is applicable retrospectively even if no exempted income was earned by assessee.
