Shapoorji Pallonji Solar Holdings Private Limited Vs ITO (Madras High Court) Writ Petition- Remedy Under Article 226 of Constitution of The India Constitutes An Extraordinary Remedy Assessee challenged the assessment order mainly on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice urging the point that the order had travelled beyond the scope of show-cause […]
Kerala High Court held that order passed rejecting claim of input tax credit (ITC) on purchase of capital goods without giving reasons for rejecting the same is unjustified and unsustainable.
ITAT Delhi held that received towards undertaking restrictive covenant of non imparting service to any other person and not to share associated goodwill of medical practice being in the nature of non compete fee is a capital receipt and not taxable under provision of the Income Tax Act.
ITO Vs Manumati Boro (ITAT Guwahati) Revenue has challenged the finding of the ld. CIT(A) deleting the addition for undisclosed sale and sustaining the addition only to the extent of net profit element embedded in the alleged undisclosed sale. We notice that the ld. Assessing Officer based on the seized records impounded during the course […]
The issue is whether the respondent is eligible to avail credit on input services on freight charges and CHA services availed upto the port for export of goods.
DCIT Vs Bhilwara Energy Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The assessee filed return of income declaring a loss of 16.13 crores. The assessee company suo moto disallowance an amount of Rs. 9.9 crores consisting of interest of Rs. 9.5 crorees and other expenses of Rs. 40 lakhs on account of disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. […]
CIT (Exemptions) Vs Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (Orissa High Court) On 12th January 2022, the CIT (E) issued a show cause notice (SCN) to the Assessee under Section 263 of the Act stating that a sum of Rs.1,11,54,33,001/- collected as development fees from its students had been directly carried to the balance sheet under […]
Deciding appeal on ex parte basis on very first day of hearing is unjustified & such order is vitiated due to violation of principles of natural justice
It is settled proposition of law that proceedings initiated and orders passed in the name of the dead person is not valid. However, it appears that the AO was not aware of the fact of death of the assessee and the copy of death certificate is furnished for the first time before us.
A compounding application under Section 279(2) of Income-tax Act, 1961 was made and is pending adjudication by CCIT. In the event of acceptance of compounding application, Act prescribes closure of criminal case.
