PCIT (Exemption) Vs Bishandayal Jewellers (Orissa High Court) Before the CIT(A), the Assessee claimed that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not given copies of the seized materials extracted from the hard disk and the pen drive. The CIT( A) called for a remand report from the AO. By the time, the remand report could be […]
There is no dispute through Annexure-1 that the earlier assessment assessing the Petitioner’s building by the Sambalpur Municipal Corporation as it was then operating raising the holding tax to Rs. 1,19,858/- and the proposal for further assessment is only made by way of notice dated 22.2.2023 enhancing the holding tax from Rs.1,19,858/- to Rs. 3,12,609/- per annum.
Service Tax not payable on ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ provided to a foreign principal, which has been utilized outside India
If sales are not disputed, entire alleged bogus purchases cannot be disallowed and only the gross profit on the alleged purchases to be disallowed. No penalty under section 271(1)(c) is leviable on estimated additions.
Provisions of Section 9 of IBC mandates Operational creditor to file CIRP application against Corporate Debtor after expiry of 10 days from date of receipt of demand notice by Corporate Debtor,
ITAT held that if a Penalty notice is vague then penalty proceedings initiated under section 271(1)(c) on that basis were vitiate
The provisions of Section 107 of the Act deal with ‘Appeal’ and provide that an appeal be filed as against any order of the State Goods and Services Tax Act within a period of 90 days. There is a condonable period of one month after the aforesaid period of 90 days, for which the authority may grant condonation, if convinced by the explanation set out by the petitioner. The appeal of petitioner has been filed after a period of 2 months and 17 days, over and above the statutory limitation of 90 + 30 days.
CESTAT held that where service provider had deployed his employees in manufacturing premises of appellant for specified job works, the same cannot be held as Manpower Supply Services.
Unnati Alloys Pvt Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Shri Jitendra Singh, Learned Counsel along with Ms. Reena Rawat, Advocate appeared for the appellants and he submits that as per the impugned order there is no independent finding against the appellants and the adjudicating authority has directly imposed the penalty without giving any reasoning. […]
Manjulata Sahoo Vs PCIT (ITAT Cuttack) It was the submission that against the order of the Tribunal, the assessee has filed appeal before the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High court of Orissa and the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of Orissa was pleased to admit the appeal of the assessee in ITA No.8 of 2021 vide order dated […]
