Circular No. 160/71/95-CX In this regard references have been received from the field formations that a large number of units whose turnover for export run into few crores are not following AR-4 procedure for export on the plea that their turnover for home consumption is less than Rs. 30 lakhs. Further, some unscrupulous manufacturers are also clearing their goods without payment of duty under the guise of export clearances.
Circular No. 159/70/95-CX Representations have been received from the Trade regarding the difficulties being faced in mentioning the amount of duty per unit under Sl. No. 1 (h)(ii) and 5 (g)(ii) of the invoice issued under Rule 57G/ 57T wherein a single invoice contains various items having different prices and are liable to duty at the same rate.
I am directed to say that certain instances have been brought to the notice of the Board, wherein show cause notices have been brought to the notice of the Board, wherein show cause notices have been issued to units working under the EOU/ EPZ scheme on matters involving interpretations of provisions and scope of exemption notification, eligibility of duty free imports etc. without
Engineering Products Export (Replenishment of Iron & Steel Intermediates) Scheme was notified by Ministry of Commerce on 1st March, 1995 and the Department of Revenue had issued Notification No. 10/95- Customs dated the 7th March, 1995 to give effect to the said scheme. In view of representations made by the Engineering Products exporters and Iron & Steel producers, the scheme has
After introduction of para 41(II) and para 59 (A) in the EXIM Policy (92-97) with effect from 30th March, 1994, under which exports by Advance Licence holders through third party were allowed, doubts were expressed by some of the Commissioners of Customs whether and how the export through a third party by an Advance Licence holder under DEEC Scheme or EPCG holder could be
I am directed to say that a request has been received from the Development commissioner, SEEPZ for delegation of powers to Assistant Commissioner of Customs, SEEPZ relating to grant of private bonded warehouse licence under section 58 of the Customs Act, 1962 in SEEPZ a Bombay
You are requested to send year wise total amount of transactions on the stock exchange, (single side) since 1990.
Rule 13(1) of Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995 permits a claim to be filed within three months from the date relevant for the applicability of amount or rate of drawback in terms of sub-rule (3) of rule 5. The proviso to said sub-rule provides that the Assistant Commissioner of Customs may, if he is satisfied that exporter was prevented by sufficient cause from filing his claim
Circular No. 158/69/95-CX It has been brought to the notice of the Board that units having facilities for twisting/ texturising the yarn and then dying / printing/ bleaching/ mercerising are being denied the benefit of exemption will not be available under Not. No. 35/95-CE dt. 16.3.95 after the addition of proviso vide Not. No. 84/95-CE dt.18.5.95 to the effect that this exemption will not be available to the clearances of yarn from a factory having facilities (including plant and equipment) producing single yarn.
Please refer to the Ministry’s earlier Circular No. 12/95-Cus. dated 20.2.95 and Circular No. 51/95-Cus. dated 24th May, 1995 regarding issue of Telegraphic Release Advice (TRA) for imports under DEEC Scheme. Some representations have been received form the trade circles complaining about delay in issue of TRA. Reasons cited for delay in the representations are that the Customs
