I am directed to say that Notification No. 83/95- Customs dated 31st March, 1995 was issued amending eight customs Notifications viz: Notification Nos. 13/81- Cus. dated 9.2.1981, 138/91 – Cus. dated 22.10.1991, 140/91- Cus. dated 22.10.1991, 95/93-Cus. dated
I am directed to enclose1 herewith a copy of Ministry of Commerce’s letter No. 6/13/95 – EP (Agri-II) dated 10th November, 1995 along with its enclosures on the above subject and to request that necessary instructions may please be issued to all concerned not to stop export of HPS Groundnut (both in shell and Kernels), Sesame seeds, safflower seeds (Kardi seed) etc. for consumption purposes.
It has been represented by various Export Promotion Councils and Associations viz. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority, New Delhi, and All India Food Preservers’ Association, New Delhi, seeking the clarification as to whether in the existing All Industry Rate of Drawback for Food/ Fruit preparations and products falling under chapter 16, 20 and 21 of
Circular No. 174/8/96-CX It has been brought to the notice of the Board that the different practices are followed by the Commissionerates regarding verification of refund vouchers & re-concilitation of refunds sanctioned in respect of Central Excise Duties.
I am directed to enclose 1 herewith a copy of letter of the Ministry of Non – Conventional Energy Sources regarding import of second hand obsolete Wind Generation Equipment being imported into India. There is a strong possibility of these Wind Turbines being heavily under – valued. You are, therefore, requested to advise all the field formation to make a careful assessment of the valuation of
Circular No. 173/7/96-CX Notification No. 22/94-CE dated 1.3.94 as amended by Notification No. 101/94-CE date 4.5.94 and Notification No. 18/95-CE dated 16.3.95 prescribed exemption from payment of duty on cartons, or converted types of paper and paper board. It apperars that view has been taken held in the field that the aforesaid exemption is not applicable in respect of printed cartons etc. of corrugated paper of paper board.
Circular No. 172/6/96-CX I am directed to say that certain doubts have been raised regarding the scope of notification no. 1/93-CE dated 1.3.93 as amended relating to the option given to a manufacturer to pay excise duty at the normal rate as per para 4 of the said notification. The point raised is whether a manufacturer who is having two factories
Circular No. 171/5/96-CX In this regard, I am directed to invite your attention to Circular No. 42/88-CX.6 dated 24th May, 1988 (copy enclosed) wherein the procedure for handling of seized documents and records has been prescribed. It is reiterated that whenever any documents/ records are seized, immediate efforts should be made to segregate the documents which are proposed to be relied upon in framing/ establishing the charges, from the remaining documents/ records.
Naval headquarters have represented that often they have to send their equipments out of India for repairs and to – import the same after the repairs and at the time of exports, the customs department insist for production of documents like bill of entry, invoice, etc. relating to their initial imports. Naval headquarters have informed that some of the equipments being over ten years old, it is difficult
I am directed to refer to notification No. 8/96- Customs and 3/ 96 – Central Excise both dated 17th January, 1996. Notification No. 8/96- Customs amends notification Nos. 13/95- Cus. and 16/95- Cus. both dated the 16th March, 1995. The effect of the amending notification is to remove the spelling error in the description of a drug ‘Mesna’ under notification No. 13/95- Cus. and to correct the
