Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Learn how business and professional income is computed under the Income-tax Act after the Finance Act, 2026. This guide explains t...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about the scope of GST on commission income. Understand the invoice test, registration thresholds, and key rulings that clar...
Income Tax : Understand the penalties, interest, and disallowance of expenditure under Section 201 for failure to comply with TDS provisions in...
Income Tax : Understand whether director remuneration is taxed as salary or business income. Learn about tax implications, employer-employee re...
Income Tax : Interest income earned by a foreign bank from foreign currency loans extended to Indian corporates was taxable on a gross basis. S...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held legal services are not FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) and directed partner-wise DTAA examination. FTS addition was de...
Income Tax : ITAT upheld taxation of IPS and CEV subsidies following the Section 2(24) amendment, while partly allowing the appeal on other iss...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Accounting Standard-19 governs accounting treatment but does not determine tax treatment under the Income-tax Act. ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Mumbai held that Explanation 1 to Section 37(1) could not apply in the absence of any finding by the competent authority ...
Until all the components of the complete article were presented together for assessment at the same point of time, Rule 2(a) of General Interpretative Rules could not be invoked to classify the parts as complete article.
Kerala High Court held that depreciation allowance is deemed to be business loss for section 71 and 72 and can be set off only against profits or gains of business and not against income from any other sources.
Consequently, the assessable value and duty must be redetermined. The goods were correctly held to be liable for confiscation under section 111(m) but were not actually confiscated nor any redemption fine was imposed.
There was no indication of action for cancellation having taken by DGFT authorities or any information provided by Revenue that an action was later taken by DGFT authorities.
CESTAT Bangalore held that benefit of notification no. 20/2006 dated 01.03.2006 and notification no. 21/2012-Cus. dated 17.03.2012 not available in case of import of garment accessories. Accordingly, 4% SAD leviable.
Light green float glass (tinted non-wired type) should be classified under tinted glass for duty purpose under the Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 70051010 provided that the goods imported matched the description of “Light Green Float Glass (Tinted Non-Wired Type).
ITAT Bangalore held that interest/ dividend from co-operative society is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. However, if payer bank is co-operative bank then deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) is not available.
CESTAT Chennai held that exemption from customs duty admissible on import of flood lights which is used for all matches conducted in the stadium whether it is world cup international match or one day international match.
AO noticed that the assessee in its computation of income claimed prepaid finance charges amounting to Rs.19,96,29,043/- and he asked to clarify or show-cause as to how the prepaid finance charges were allowable.
Compensation received under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act was taxable under section 56(2)(viii) r.w.s 145B(1) as the provisions of section 10(37) deal with ‘compensation’ only and not interest on compensation or enhanced compensation.
