Income Tax : PGBP governs the computation of business and professional income. It defines chargeable income (Sec. 28, 41) including statutory a...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about the scope of GST on commission income. Understand the invoice test, registration thresholds, and key rulings that clar...
Income Tax : Understand the penalties, interest, and disallowance of expenditure under Section 201 for failure to comply with TDS provisions in...
Income Tax : Understand whether director remuneration is taxed as salary or business income. Learn about tax implications, employer-employee re...
Income Tax : Explore the discussion between CA Micky and CA Mini on Sections 68 & 44AD of the Income Tax Act. Learn about unexplained cash cred...
Income Tax : Consistency over technicalities: ITAT Mumbai allowed actuarial pension provision as an ascertained liability, rejected mechanical ...
Service Tax : Extended period of limitation could not be invoked in the absence of fraud, suppression or wilful misstatement with intent to evad...
Custom Duty : The case addressed whether a custodian could be held liable for duty when container contents differed from declared goods. The Tri...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that interest on bank deposits from operational funds of a co-operative credit society is eligible for deducti...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that omission of taxable foreign exchange gain in the return attracts penalty. It noted that disclosure during a...
ITAT Raipur held that disallowance under section 43B of the Income Tax Act towards unpaid VAT liability cannot be sustained since the amount was not claimed as an expenditure in P&L account. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
The prohibition from allowing input tax credit is a statutory mandate, and the view taken by the orders impugned, in the facts and circumstances of this case, is available and correct.
Thus, we do not find any error in the impugned order for the purpose of interference, therefore, the present appeal is found to be without any merit and the same is hereby dismissed though without any order as to costs.
Delhi High Court held that Eating House Registration/ License shall be deemed to be duly registered until its registration certificate is duly renewed OR renewal has been refused in terms of para-6(ii) of the Delhi Eating Houses, Registration Regulations, 2023.
Therefore, such interest partook the character of the compensation itself. The Court further observed that the statutory obligation to pay compensation for compulsory acquisition was rooted in Article 300A of the Constitution, which safeguarded a citizen’s right to property.
The assessee is engaged in the business of running a Ginning Mill and dealing in cotton. A search and seizure action u/s. 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the assessee on 12/02/2015.
Delhi High Court held that matters having financial liabilities or penal consequences cannot be kept unresolved for years. Thus, show cause notice issued in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2018 adjudicated vide order issued in 2024 is liable to be quashed.
Complainants stated that sometime in March – 2018, Respondent No.- 1 started Shifting its Work from Goregaon Godown to Bhivandi Godown and ultimately closed Down the Establishment at Goregaon and shifted its activities to Bhivandi.
Delhi High Court held that the provisioning for Asset Reconstruction Cost qualified the prescriptions of AS 29 and the assessee was thus justified in accounting for the same. Thus, that question is answered in favour of assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that seized document merely indicates some rates than pinpointing any specific on-money payment or receipt; as the case may be, involving the assessee. Thus, addition is liable to be deleted.
