Income Tax : Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order on Cricket Australia vs. ACIT (International Taxation). Analysis includes why license f...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT rules in Ares Diversified Vs ACIT that rejection of belated objections by DRP does not extend the limitation for passin...
Income Tax : Read about Bombay High Courts decision upholding ITAT's order directing Vodafone India to deposit Rs.230 crores to stay income tax...
Income Tax : Read the full text of the Delhi ITAT order on Denso (Thailand) vs ACIT, discussing tax liability for technical services under Indi...
Income Tax : ITAT emphasized that under the accrual system, provisions for outstanding expenses can indeed be recognized based on estimates and...
ITAT Delhi permits a Section 54 deduction that wasn’t claimed in original or revised returns. The case highlights the powers of appellate authorities.
ITAT Mumbai held that cost reimbursement received towards providing support services is taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) both under Section 9(1) (vii) of the Act as well as Article 12(4) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
ITAT Delhi held that depreciation on Solar Power Plant installed on office building which is part of factory and electricity so generated is used for factory only is allowable as per provision of law.
ITAT Delhi held that addition on account of attributing income from offshore supplies to permanent establishment in India unjustified in case of loss.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that an assessment order against a non-existent entity (Pipal Research Analytics) is invalid. Insight into Crisil Ltd vs ACIT case.
ITAT Mumbai imposes Rs. 10,000 cost on Hunt International Investments LLC for non-response to notices under section 142(1). Details on the case inside.
Analysis of ITAT Delhi’s ruling in Bushra Javed Vs ACIT: Indexation benefits for acquisition costs based on payment year. Read the full legal insight here.
ITAT Delhi held that the receipts from offshore supply of rolling stock (train sets) cannot be taxable in India as the transfer of title over the goods has taken place outside India.
ITAT Mumbai held that as per section 92CA of the Income Tax Act, TPO can pass the order at any time before 60 days prior to the date on which period of limitation referred u/s 153 expires. TPO order passed after the prescribed time limit is non-est and barred by limitation.
ITAT Delhi held that there is no justification of adopting lower Fair Market Value (FMV) merely on the basis of DVO report as DVO has failed to consider the specific features of the property commanding higher value.
