Income Tax : Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order on Cricket Australia vs. ACIT (International Taxation). Analysis includes why license f...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT rules in Ares Diversified Vs ACIT that rejection of belated objections by DRP does not extend the limitation for passin...
Income Tax : Read about Bombay High Courts decision upholding ITAT's order directing Vodafone India to deposit Rs.230 crores to stay income tax...
Income Tax : Read the full text of the Delhi ITAT order on Denso (Thailand) vs ACIT, discussing tax liability for technical services under Indi...
Income Tax : ITAT emphasized that under the accrual system, provisions for outstanding expenses can indeed be recognized based on estimates and...
Delhi High Court ruling on Income Tax: Department’s U-turn on 80IA deduction in the 4th year deemed unjustified. Case analysis of PCIT vs. BT Global Communications India Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that the consideration received in terms of Strategic Oversight Services Agreements (SOSA) cannot be termed as Royalty under Article 12 of the DTAA even if extensive services are rendered which includes access to written knowledge, processes, and commercial information in furtherance of the services.
Dilipkumar Jashbai Patel Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)- Section 144C(3) r.w.s. 144C(4) Mandate AO to Conclude Assessment within One Month if Assessee Accepts Draft Order or Fails to File Objection
Bombay High Court held that assessment order passed by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) two years after the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) directions, is time barred and cannot be sustained.
Delhi High Court supports ITAT’s verdict on the selection of comparables for determining the Arm’s Length Price of an international transaction. Get insights on PCIT vs Chrys Capital
FedEx Express Transportation and Supply Chain Services (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The case of FedEx Express Transportation and Supply Chain Services (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) revolves around the validity of a Transfer Pricing order, draft assessment order, and the consequent final assessment order. The key contention is whether the […]
ITAT Delhi held that passing of final assessment order without complying with the terms of section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is untenable in law.
In a significant ruling, ITAT Ahmedabad declares an assessment order void, passed in the name of a non-existent entity after a court-approved amalgamation.
Held that the amounts received for the use of transponder of tele-communication service charges are not royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and also under Article 12(8) of Indo Netherland DTAA.
Delhi High Court invalidates final assessment order due to failure to pass a draft assessment order in Sinogas Management PTE LTD vs. DCIT case.
