Follow Us:

CA Deepak Aggarwal

Latest Articles


Services Tax Provisions under Budget 2016 in Q & A Format

Income Tax : Question - What is Krishi Kalyan Cess? Answer - An enabling provision is being made to levy Krishi Kalyan Cess on all taxable serv...

February 29, 2016 8017 Views 1 comment Print

Input Tax Credit in Model GST Law, 2016

Goods and Services Tax : ♠ Input Tax Credit means credit of input tax. ♠ Every taxable person is entitled to take credit of input tax. ♠ Input tax me...

December 15, 2015 5286 Views 0 comment Print

The Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2016 (IGST)

Goods and Services Tax : This act may be called the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2016. It extends to whole India. IGST applicable on all supplies...

December 10, 2015 9050 Views 0 comment Print

Old provisions as per Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 with amended provisions by Negotiable Instrument Amendment Act, 2015

Corporate Law : a cheque in the electronic form means a cheque drawn in electronic form by using any computer resource and signed in a secure sys...

December 10, 2015 3422 Views 0 comment Print

Quick Review of Model Goods and Services Tax Act, 2016

Goods and Services Tax : This act may be called the Central GST Act, 2016 (CGST) / State GST Act, 2016 (SGST). It extends to the whole India. In case of SG...

December 5, 2015 2999 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


No capital gain on unaccrued contingent deferred consideration

Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that as per agreement, the deferred consideration is payable over a period of four years and the formula pr...

April 22, 2016 4789 Views 0 comment Print

S. 263 Revision for starting fishing & roving enquiries not valid

Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held In the case of M/s. Rachana Finance & Investments Pvt. Ltd. & M/s. Repute Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT that in th...

April 22, 2016 2104 Views 0 comment Print

Sec.153A Addition without incriminating material w.r.t. completed assessments not valid

Income Tax : It is held that Completed assessments can be interfered with by the AO while making the assessment under Section 153 A only on the...

April 22, 2016 2059 Views 0 comment Print

S.244A Interest payable on refund of excess self assessment tax

Income Tax : Calcutta High Court held In the case of ADIT vs. Sh. Dhan Singh Sharma that clause 244A (1) (b) is residual in nature which prescr...

April 20, 2016 12775 Views 0 comment Print

Sec.69/69A- Addition cannot be challenged on mere denial of transaction

Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held in the case of Hassan Ali Khan vs. DCIT that the assessee claiming that he has no bank account or based on transf...

April 18, 2016 2872 Views 0 comment Print


Sec. 10B Interest on FDRs on margin kept in bank for utilization of letter of credit limits is business Income

October 30, 2015 1049 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi High Court held In the case of Principal CIT vs. Universal Precision Screws that interest on fixed deposits has the requisite characteristic of business income and has a nexus to the business activities of the Assessee.

Adhoc disallowance of expenses without finding any specific defects in books of account not justified

October 30, 2015 11872 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Lucknow held In the case of M/s Vijay Infrastructure Limited vs. ACIT that on the basis of general observations, without pointing out even a single specific defect in the vouchers or books of accounts, ad hoc disallowance made by Assessing Officer is not justifiable.

Reopening for not considering a SC Judgment in original assessment not valid

October 30, 2015 994 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi High Court held In the case of Coperion Ideal Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT that the mere fact that there was a judgment of the Supreme Court of 1997 which was not noticed by the AO when he framed the original assessment cannot per se constitute the only material on the basis of which the assessment could have been reopened.

Hamdard eligible for exemption u/s 10(23C) (iv) for business held in trust, as dominant purpose of assessee is charitable

October 29, 2015 3228 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi High Court held In the case of Hamdard Laboratories India and Anr vs. ADIT (E) & DGIT (E) that Hamdard‟s objects are charitable in nature and its activities relating to manufacture and sale of unani medicines

Regrouping in audited financials is not permitted after signing of accounts: HC

October 29, 2015 9397 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi High Court held In the case of CIT vs. Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt. Ltd. that any changes in the audited financials like for e.g., the ‘regrouping’ of shares in the present case, if at all permissible, has to be preceded by a legally acceptable procedure adopted by the Assessee

AO is time bound to dispose of objections in response to notice u/s 148 by a speaking order: HC

October 29, 2015 2664 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi High Court held In the case of CIT vs. M/s Multiplex Trading & Industrial Co. Ltd. that the requirements regarding recording the reasons to believe; communicating the same to the Assessee; permitting the Assessee to file the objections

ITAT empowered to allow deduction u/s 80IB (10) even if requirement u/s 80AC is not complied with, in case of conflict of opinions: HC

October 29, 2015 3346 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi High Court held In the case of CIT vs. M/s Unitech Ltd. that where there are conflicts of opinions of the various benches of the ITAT on the provision u/s 80AC of requirement of return filing before due date to claim deduction u/s 80IB (10)

Mere copy of notice given during reassessment proceedings will not meet mandatory requirement of issue & service of notice

October 29, 2015 744 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi High Court held In the case of Principal CIT vs. Atlanta Capital Pvt. Ltd. that the requirement of both the issuance and the service of such upon the Assessee for the purposes of Section 147 and 148 of the Act are mandatory ‘jurisdictional requirements’.

No TDS liability u/s 194A on interest paid which is compensatory in nature

October 29, 2015 4229 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Chennai held In the case of The ACIT vs. M/s. Trimex Industries (P) Ltd that payment of interest which has direct link or immediate nexus with the trading liability being connected with the purchase payment

Disallowance u/s 14A, suo moto or otherwise, not sustainable if interest free funds exceeds tax free investments

October 28, 2015 3741 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Ahmedabad held In the case of UTI Bank Ltd. vs. ACIT that we find that the assessee’s interest free deposits exceed its tax free investment in current year as well as in succeeding assessment year 2003-04. The tribunal and hon’ble jurisdictional high court deleted an identical section 14A disallowance based on the very presumption.

Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930