Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Service of notice was mandatory before Income Tax Reassessment therefore, penalty u/s 271(1)(b) was quashed

Case Law Details

Case Name
General Traders Vs Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Jharkhand High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement
General Traders Vs Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Jharkhand High Court) Conclusion: Since valid service of notice was a mandatory jurisdictional requirement before initiating reassessment proceedings, therefore, purported notices issued under Section 148 including reassessment proceedings under Section 147 as also under Section 142(1) against assessee, as well as the ex parte assessment orders passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 read with Section 144B and ex parte penalty Orders under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271(1)(b) which were subject matter of both these writ petition...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *