Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ulahannan Mudakkalayil Leela Vs ITO (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ulahannan Mudakkalayil Leela Vs ITO (Kerala High Court) Penalty Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed When Related Assessment Appeal Pending – Tribunal Condoned Delay in Assessment & HC Extends Relief to Penalty Appeal The petitioner, a 75-year-old licensed stamp vendor, challenged order of CIT(A)-NFAC rejecting her appeal against a penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) for AY 2016-17, solely on the ground of 525 days’ delay in filing. Earlier, the assessment order for the same year had also been challenged belatedly (651 days). Though CIT(A) dismissed that appeal, the ITAT condoned the delay & rem...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930