Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arvind Kumar Rungta Vs ITO (ITAT Patna)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arvind Kumar Rungta Vs ITO (ITAT Patna) Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Explained by Prior Withdrawal for Medical Emergency — ITAT Deletes ₹8 Lakh Addition The Patna Bench of the ITAT condoned a delay of 409 days in filing the appeal, holding the reasons to be bona fide, and proceeded to decide the matter on merits. The case involved addition of ₹8 lakh under section 69A on account of alleged unexplained cash deposits made during the demonetisation period. The assessee, a salaried employee with no other source of income, had withdrawn ₹9 lakh in April 2016 for a proposed heart surg...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930