Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

Katrina Kaif (Assessee) not liable to pay service tax if already paid by agent

Case Name : Ms. Katrina R. Turcotte Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-I
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/387 OF 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904)

Ship broker is not a commission agent and not liable to Service Tax

Case Name : Interocean Shipping Company Vs Commissioner of Service-Tax, Delhi (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order Nos. ST/A/694-697/2012-CUS., Appeal Nos. ST/145, 146, 545 & 546 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

No Service tax chargeable if services not rendered in India

Case Name : Commissioner of Service-Tax, Chennai Vs Heidelberg India (P.) Ltd. (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Appeal Nos. ST/626 & 627 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Chennai (646)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Service tax Penalty to be waived off when there exists no mala-fide intentions of assessee for non-payment of ST

Case Name : Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/641 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Liaison work is not Management Consultancy Service

Case Name : Bharti Televentures Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. ST/A/598 of 2012-CUS
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

No GTA services if custodial rights not transferred to transporter

Case Name : Birla Ready Mix Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order Nos. ST/A/604-605/12-CUS
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

For Refund service tax paid on common input services is to be apportioned in Turnover Ratio

Case Name : Mahindra World City (Jaipur) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 496 OF 2012-SM(BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Input credit cannot be denied on mere procedural grounds

Case Name : Jindal Stainless Steelway Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/99/2013/SMB/C-IV
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

CENVAT Credit & Refund can be availed even without registration

Case Name : Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai Vs Varizon Data Services (I) (P.) Ltd. (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Stay Order No. 369 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Chennai (646)

Telephone services at residence of workers are input services

Case Name : Bank of India Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/1117/WZB/Ahd of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031