Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

Appeal my be dismissed if Assessee do not attend the proceedings

Case Name : Aryavart Bank Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 55358-55359 OF 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Service tax not payable on management, maintenance or repair of roads between 16-6-2005 to 26-6-2009

Case Name : Mehar Singh & Co. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 55380 OF 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Curable defects do not take away right to appeal

Case Name : M.R.J. Steels (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Meerut-I (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/1366-1367/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

CENVAT Credit cannot be denied merely on the ground that HO who raised invoice was not registered under central registration during material period

Case Name : M/s. Rohit Surfactants Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 1408-1409 Of 2012-SM & (BR) (PB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Taxability of Services provided by Sec. 25 Company for treatment / recycling of effluent solid waste

Case Name : Vapi Waste & Effluent Management Co. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/168 Of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Composite Service Tax demand without proper service classification is not sustainable

Case Name : ABAK Constructions Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Tirupati (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Stay Order No. 86-87 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/01/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

No Penalty for inadvertent excess credit claimed which was reversed subsequently

Case Name : M/s Prayas Casting Ltd. Vs. CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/544/2012-WZB/AHD
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Service Tax on Insurance Expense of Cash and Motor car Eligible for Input Credit

Case Name : M/s. DSCL Sugar Vs CCE (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Stay Order No. S-258/2012/-SM (BR)(PB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/03/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessee may pay service tax on exempted services

Case Name : Crown Products (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/60-61/2012-WZB/C-IV (SMB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

ST – ‘Management agent’, cannot claim exemption available to a ‘commission agent’ under Notification No. 13/2003

Case Name : Provincial Life Style Retail Services Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/56/2013/SMB/C-IV
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031