Chhattisgarh High Court held that waiver of mandatory pre-deposit under section 35-F of the Central Excise Act 1944 not accepted. However, alternative prayer to grant extension of time limit for pre-deposit accepted and three months further time is granted.
committed irregularity by not depositing GST in the account(s) of the Central and State Governments. Based upon which, the offence has been registered.
Chhattisgarh High Court directed works contractor involved in construction of road, bridges, tolls, etc. to make fresh claim showing difference of tax liability that was incurred at the time of submission of bids and excess tax paid in light of introduction of GST levying higher tax on works contract services.
HC directed Water Resources Department to take into consideration the Representation filed by CG Associates w.r.t the refund of additional amount of GST paid by the CG Associates due to change in rate of taxes.
Availability of alternative remedy cannot be an absolute bar to file a writ petition in cases where principles of natural justice has been violated.
Paritosh Kumar Singh Alias Diwakar Choudhary Vs Senior Intelligence Officer (Chhattisgarh High Court) 1. This is second application on behalf of applicants under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail as applicants are in custody since 25.1.2021 in connection with Crime/DDGI Case No.124/2020-21 registered in the office of the […]
Decision not to reimburse would be too harsh a decision on the part of the respondents, for the reason that the Contractor is not at fault in any manner for incurring the additional tax liability that has occurred because of the introduction of any new tax.
HC allowed petition filed by assessee to seek reimbursement of additional tax liability on implementation of GST law for contracts and work orders which had been executed before GST regime.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that the prosecution has miserably failed to prove that the appellant possessed properties disproportionate to his known source of income. Accordingly, appellant is acquitted of the charge under Sections 13(1)(e) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and hence bail granted.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that lease charges paid by the Railways Department to the Petitioner Company is not subjected to levy of VAT as the taxable event is the transfer of right to use goods and not right to use goods or the use of goods
