CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services of transportation of goods by a person other than GTA are clearly exempt under Section 66D (P)(i)(A) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on the Jindal Fibres Vs C.C.-Kandla case, regarding penalties for misdeclared goods under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962. Understand the implications for companies operating within SEZs.
The CESTAT Ahmedabad ordered a crucial conversion from DFRC to DEEC scheme in the case of Vinny Royal Plasticoates Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs. Dive in to understand the case details and implications.
CESTAT Ahmedabad remanded the matter for reconsideration in case of classification of goods i.e. Flexible Intermediate Bulk Containers under HSN code 63053200 or under 39231090.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that there is no requirement of the actual use of inputs and quantities of imported goods for claiming DFIA i.e. Duty-Free Import Authorization benefit.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that Medicament Supplies to Government Hospitals and Institutional Buyers shall be valued in terms of Section 4 and not Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
An insightful analysis of the CESTAT Ahmedabad’s ruling in Magnam Netlink Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T case, emphasizing the legality of cenvat credit reversal on exempted services like “Trading”.
The case at hand pertains to the valuation of Lead Acid Batteries and the determination of whether these should be valued under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The core question revolves around the charging status of the batteries and where the charging occurs.
Comprehensive review and implications of the CESTAT Ahmedabads decision in the Modest Infrastructure Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case.
Detailed review and implications of CESTAT Ahmedabads judgment in the case of West Coast Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Vs C.C.E.-Ahmedabad.
