Kerala High Court held that the goods seized for want of Part-B of E-Way Bill can be released on furnishing bank guarantee and a simple bond without sureties.
Addition under section 68 on account of bogus share capital and exorbitant premium was not justified as where the funds had been received through banking channel and there was no dispute about the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the investors.
Pramod Behera Construction Vs Commissioner of State Tax (Orissa High Court) We find that although under the GST regime all applications required to be done online. in the event any dealer faces any problem in uploading such data, the Commissioner ought to place alternative authority with the Sales Tax Officer or appropriate officer before whom […]
Chambal Fertilisers And Chemicals Ltd Vs JCIT (Rajasthan High Court) The assessee is of the considered opinion that the education cess and secondary & higher education cess (collectively called as education cess) are not a “tax” and hence not disallowable u/s 40(a)(ii) of the Act on the basis of following submission:- (1) That on a plain reading of the above […]
Digvijay Singh Bhandari Vs. Shri Nishant Warwade & Others (Madhya Pradesh HC) The entire petition is based on the newspaper published in the local newspaper about distribution of free IPL match passes worth of Rs.60.00 lac to Collector. No other material has been produced in the present petition in support of the allegations. HC held […]
The manner of distribution of the assets of a company during liquidation is fraught with ambiguity and settlement of such claims arising out of it has inconvenienced the parties concerned since the advent of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code).
Leo Edibles & Fats Limited Vs TRO (Central) (Andhra Pradesh HC) Section 178 of the Act of 1961 is titled ‘Company in liquidation’. Under sub-section (1) thereof, the liquidator of a company which is being wound up, or a person who is appointed as a Receiver of the assets of such company has to give […]
Delhi HC held that that at least for the period till 31.03.2019, the CBDT shall issue an appropriate direction, and also create a platform by amending the digital form of substituting them properly to enable opt out from the mandatory requirement of having to furnish Aadhar Registration or Aadhar linkage, for the duration, the exemption subsists i.e. till 31.03.2019.
Where assessee was unable to file Tran-1 form within due date owing to technical glitches in GST website and could not avail of Cenvat credit, the assessee was granted liberty to approach to concerned nodal officer who was directed to look into the issue and facilitate the uploading of Form TRAN-1 without reference to any time frame
M/s. Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court) Issue- Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has power under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to give directions for fresh enquiry into the aspects of the subject matter of appeal filed before it either suo motu or on any grounds […]
