Stay against Penalty order under IBC allowed against petitioner who has violated Terms of Moratorium
A.Y. Garment International Private Ltd. Vs DCIT (Karnatka High Court) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the amendment made by Finance Act, 2010 in the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not retrospective in operation on the facts and circumstances of the case? The issue whether the […]
PCIT Vs Hybrid Financial Services Ltd (Bombay High Court) Under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Act, the amount of any bad debt or any part thereof which is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee for the previous year is to be allowed as deduction in computing income under Section 28 of the […]
Gateway Leaisng Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) Section 148- Revenue cannot travel beyond reasons recorded & same cannot be supplemented at the Later stage. Reasons which are recorded by the Assessing Officer for re-opening an assessment are the only reasons which can be considered when the formation of the belief is impugned; such […]
Asha Ram Suryavanshi Vs Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank (Chhattisgarh High Court) There is a clear distinction between the term ‘Resignation’ and ‘Voluntary Retirement’. The reasons in the application for voluntary retirement cannot be construed by the management of it being an application for resignation from service. The management/employer cannot give its own interpretation to an application […]
Anticipatory Bail Granted against GST Evasion by considering Clean Criminal History of Applicant along with furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties.
At the outset, it is important to note that the claim of the Plaintiff that ISKCON is a well-known trade mark is not disputed by the Defendant. It is clear that ISKCON is a coined trade mark of the Plaintiff, that is to say that the said term ISKCON did not exists prior to the Plaintiff’s adoption and use of the same.
Writ petition is filed for challenging order passed by National Anti-Profiteering Authority under CGST Act. HC approved Stay Application for Interest, Penalty & Investigation levied by Anti-Profiteering Authority
The issue under consideration is whether land held as stock, transferred upon HUF – partition, tantamount to conversion into capital asset for the purpose of imposing a capital gain tax?
The issue under consideration is whether person is entitled to continue at the same place where he was posted at the time of passing the suspension order and committing the alleged misconduct?
