In the instant case, the petitioner is requesting for bail against the offenses under Sections 132(1), (b), and (c) of Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
DCIT Vs. Hitachi Power Europe GmbH (Madras High Court) The power to be exercised by the Settlement Commission under sub-Section (2C) of Section 245D is within a period of fifteen days’ from the date of receipt of the report of the CIT. This provision gives power to the Settlement Commission to declare an application as […]
Mohd Nashruddin Khan Vs. Union of India (Delhi High Court) The instant petition is filed by the petitioner to seek quashing of the respective Detention Orders. High Court state that the Supreme Court has held that the basis of detention is the satisfaction of the Executive – of a reasonable probability of the likelihood of […]
whether passing the final assessment order on the same day when the matter was listed for hearing without waiting for the assessee till the end of the working day is justified in law?
Gangotri Textiles Ltd. Vs. DCIT (Madras High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied by the assessing officer is justified in law? In the present case, the assessee did not disclose about the sale of the lands and windmill in the return of income, which was clear from the perusal […]
A refund application under Section 54 of the CGST Act read with Rule 89 and Rule 90(3) of the CGST Rules is automatically treated as rejected and the second refund application is treated as a fresh application and the interest amount is calculated only from the date of the second refund application or subsequent applications which are filed after receiving the deficiency memos.
The moot question raised in the writ petition is, whether the writ petitioners are entitled to an extension of the usance period of the Letter of Credit Facility sanctioned to the writ petitioners from 180 days to 270 days.
Handoo & Handoo Legal Consultants Vs. Union of India (Delhi High Court) The plea of the petitioner(s) in the present applications is that they have been denied the benefit of the Scheme only on the ground that they uploaded the forms pursuant to the order dated 06.12.2018 of this Court. The learned counsel for the […]
whether the Tribunal is correct in making the addition of the entire jewellery found at the time of search as undisclosed income without appreciating that the said jewellery was acquired at the time of marriage over a period of time?
National Asphalt Products and Construction Company Vs State of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court) The issue under consideration is whether sales tax officer is justified in levying penalty at twice the amount of entry tax? High Court states that, under the Act penalty may be imposed for failure to register as a dealer Section 9(1) […]
