Alliance Filaments Ltd Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court) A plain reading of the reasons recorded revels that the Assessing Officer has solely relied on the information received from the Investigation Wing- Surat. We are of the view that, the Assessing Officer has not applied his independent mind while recording the reasons that the income has […]
Pradeep Kumar Jindal Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) In the present case, admittedly, there is no adjudication by the ITAT on merits. In our opinion, the order dated 10th December, 2015 of the ITAT, dismissing the appeal of the petitioner for non-prosecution and not on merits, as the ITAT was required to do notwithstanding the […]
SKF Finvest Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) We dispose of this writ application directing the writ applicant that he shall maintain the minimum balance of Rs.22 lac in the bank account in question up to 21st September 2021. On this condition, we permit the writ applicant to operate his bank […]
Counsel for the Union of India has vehemently opposed the bad application. It is contended that fake firms were created for claiming input tax credit. From the investigation, it is revealed that the firms were fake. The proprietor and owner of the firms are not traceable. It is further contended that evasion of tax has an effect on the economy of the Nation and Court should not be liberal in granting bail to such offenders.
M/s Premier Bars Private Limited Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner company applied for settlement of arrears of demand raised in pursuance of order dated 30th March, 2017 and as such, submitted application under the provisions of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Learned […]
SKJ Finvest Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Mr. Nainawati, the learned counsel appearing for the writapplicant submits that his client shall maintain the minimum balance of Rs.22 lac in the bank account which has been attached by the department. According to Mr. Nainawati, at the time of attachment of the […]
CIT Vs Y.V. Subramaniam (Madras High Court) The Tribunal, while allowing the assessee’s appeal, observed that the assessment order was passed after making full verification and the order of the CIT is based on no reason and he has simply given an abrupt finding that the assessment order is erroneous insofar as it is prejudicial […]
Kans Wedding Centre Vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes (Kerala High Court) in the event the registered persons fail to file returns for a continuous period of six months, the proper officer can cancel the registration, but that has to be done by granting opportunity of hearing to the registered person. Rule 22 of the GST […]
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Kamla Town Trust reported in (1996) 84 Taxman 248 (SC) held that the rectification shall not have retrospective effect and would operate prospectively from the date when the rectification saw the light of the day.
Jsk Marketing Limited & Anr Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) A conjoint reading of Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 70 & 174 of the CGST Act show that though the Central Excise Act and the Finance Act, 1994 to […]
