National Radio Electronics Corporation Vs State Tax Officer (Intelligence) (Kerala High Court) The petitioner is challenging Ext.P3 order issued under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 to the extent it invoked the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner, while obtaining release of the goods detained under Section 129(1) of the […]
Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent has opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner had created the fake seven firms and claimed input tax credit of Rs.16,99,89,923 (Sixteen Crores Ninety Nine lacs Eighty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Three).
Md Faruk Alam Vs State of Assam (Gauhati High Court) In accordance with the order dated 30.9.2021, Mr. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor as well as Mr. M. Phukan, learned Public Prosecutor, has interaction with one Assistant Commissioner of GST, and after interaction and verification of the relevant GST Portal, the GST papers furnished by […]
Cresent Co. Vs CIT (Orissa High Court) In the present case, mere non-issuance of production of sale memos could not have been a ground to reject the entire books of account particularly since it pertained to sale of country liquor to tribal populations. Also the ITAT appears to have overlooked the fact that the books […]
K.Vinodhkumar Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court) Learned counsel for writ petitioner draws the attention of this court to Sub Rule (3) of Rule 86 A and submits that on a demurrer that even if the attachment is for a valid reason under 86 A, the same elapsed on 17.02.2021, on […]
Metharam Pinjani Vs Income Tax Department (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Learned counsel for the assessee/petitioner submits that despite the said prayer having been made for personal hearing contained in Para 7 of the reply (at Page No. 115 of the Paper Book), no personal hearing was afforded and the impugned order was passed thereby amounting […]
Assistant Commissioner of Taxes, Bongaigaon, has reported that there is no record of the vehicle and there is also no proper document to support transportation of goods by the said vehicle as indicated by the petitioner in his petition as well as in the complaint. That being so, whatever papers submitted by the petitioner to prove the genuineness of his GST payment appears not only to be incorrect, but false also.
Reeta Devi Vs Sima Devi (Jharkhand High Court) Going by the definition of wages as given under Section 2(m) of the Employees Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 Act the contention of the Insurance Company that food allowance of Rs.80 per day shall not constitute part of wages is not tenable. A plain reading of the definition […]
Dineshbhai Dhudabhai Patel Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) Facts in brief would indicate that the petitioner was working as a Junior Clerk (Administration). Pursuant to a selection held by the Gujarat Panchayat Services Selection Board, he was engaged in a five years contract basis by an order dated 08.12.2011. A complaint was filed […]
PCIT Vs Orchid Griha Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (Calcutta High Court) Tribunal agreed with CIT(A) that after conversion of inventory into fixed asset the firm revalued the developed land including construction thereon in order to bring it in line with the current market value to justify the business assistance secured by the firm from the banks […]
