Dar Credit And Capital Limited Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) In this case High Court has found Section 148 Notice issued by AO as proper and Valid and further held that Rejection of the petitioner’s objection against the impugned notice under Section 148 of the Act does not mean that it has become […]
The petitioner has raised a pertinent grievance in this writ petition that the Form GST ITC-02A was not available on the GSTN Portal for the entire period of 30 days from the registration of its separate business verticals and even till the date of filing of the instant writ petition
Sharad Garg Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) By way of the present batch of petitions, this Court has been called upon to decide the validity of E-notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The Petitioners have classified the matters in the following categories: 1. Category […]
A S L Enterprises Ltd. Vs Senior Joint Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Whether proviso to Section 84(1) of the West Bengal VAT Act, 2003 which provides for mandatory pre-deposit of 15% is ultra vires? 1. Insisting the dealer to produce the proof of payment of 15% of the disputed tax in terms of the second proviso […]
This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the making, releasing and telecasting certain objectionable scenes in the film The Kashmir Movie i.e. The Kashmir Files showing mass murders of Kashmiri Pandits by Muslims and exodus of some Kashmiri Pandits during the Kashmir Insurgency causing hurt to the religious sentiments of several Muslims around the world as illegal and arbitrary.
CA. Manisha Mehta Vs The Board of Directors of Represented by its Managing Director of ICICI Bank and ors. (Bombay High Court) The main prayer of the petitioners is for a declaration that natural justice should be read into section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The SARFAESI Act is intended to facilitate quick recovery of […]
Section 70 and 71 mandate that the income disclosed in VDIS shall not be included income under section 139 means income which had already been disclosed and that assessment is not liable to be reopened.
SSG Furnising LLP Vs Assistant Commissioner (Delhi High Court) Present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned show cause notice dated 14th February, 2022 issued by the Respondents as well as for directions to the Respondents to remove the suspension of GST Registration of the Petitioner and to declare Rule 21A of the CGST […]
Rohit Berlia Vs Intelligence Officer, Director General of Goods & Service Tax Intelligence (Orissa High Court) In the instant case, the petitioner was arrested on 05.08.2021 for an offence punishable under Section 132(1)(c) CGST Act, 2017 having availed fake ITC by the firm M/s. Arshee Ventures during the period from July, 2017 to March, 2019. […]
Sabu M. Jacob Vs State of Kerala (Kerala High Court) The sum and substance of the prosecution case is that, the petitioner who is the Managing Director of Kitex Garments Limited failed to ensure, health, safety and welfare of the workers, while they were at work in the factory by providing and maintaining arrangements for […]
