Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All High Courts

Reassessment Notice based on primacies material related to bogus purchases is valid

April 19, 2022 4950 Views 0 comment Print

In reassessment it is only required to see whether there is prima facie material before the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings and other requirements under the law, pre­condition i.e. of taking approval/sanction under Section 151, before issuance of notice under Section 148 is followed or not. Whether there is prima facie material available on the basis of which department can reopen case and not sufficiency or correctness of material to be considered.

Revocation of cancellation of GST registration – Cancelled due to non-filing of Returns

April 19, 2022 4446 Views 0 comment Print

Tahura Enterprise Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) HC take notice of the fact that the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs extended the time limit for filing application for revocation of cancellation of registration and the limitation for all the orders passed on or before 12.06.2020 was to effectively commence from 31.08.2020. […]

HC Quashes non-speaking orders under GST in Form GST-DRC-07

April 19, 2022 3972 Views 0 comment Print

HC set aside the demand order passed in Form DRC-07 by the Revenue Department, on the grounds of non-speaking order. All the relevant aspects of the matter were not considered and were not reflected in order.

Compliance of Pre-Deposit Under Section 43(5) of RERA Act is Mandatory

April 18, 2022 12654 Views 0 comment Print

Air Force Naval Housing Board Air Force Station Vs U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority And Another (Allahabad High Court) The word ‘promoter’ has been deliberately used by the legislature in the proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 43, as sub­section (5) provides a remedy of statutory appeal to any person aggrieved by the direction or […]

High Court Extends One Time Settlement Time Period allowed by Bank

April 18, 2022 14943 Views 0 comment Print

High Court rules in favor of petitioner Amrik Singh, extending OTS payment deadline. Get insights on the DCB Bank case in Punjab and Haryana High Court

MEIS Scheme benefit cannot be given if petitioner not opted for it in Shipping Bill

April 18, 2022 3534 Views 0 comment Print

Adroit Industries (India) Ltd. Vs Union of India (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Facts of the case are not in dispute to the effect that the petitioner during the relevant period i.e. 2015-20 was entitled to avail the benefit of MEIS but could not avail of such benefit as the concerned staff did not declare the […]

Arbitration Agreement – Analysis of recent Delhi High Court Judgement

April 18, 2022 5697 Views 0 comment Print

Parsvnath Developers Ltd Vs Future Retail Limited (Delhi High Court) Arbitration Agreement : Sufficiency of stamp duty on agreement & nature of contract cannot be adjudicated by Court U/s 11 Of A&C Act. The dispute as to whether the contract was sufficiently stamped or not, and the averments made by the petitioner with respect to the […]

Erroneous grant of refund and return of such refund amount- HC directs dept to re-credit/restore ITC in in electronic tax ledger

April 18, 2022 2883 Views 0 comment Print

I-Tech Plast India Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) In so far as the erroneous grant of refund and return of such refund amount together with interest by the writ-applicant is concerned, the same is undisputed. That being the case, the first part of the transaction is nullified inasmuch as the amount […]

HC directs dept. to complete delayed final GST assessment proceedings within 2 Months

April 18, 2022 618 Views 0 comment Print

Modern Syntex Vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST And Central Excise (Gujarat High Court) The grievance of the writ-applicant is that the final GST  assessment proceedings are yet to be undertaken. No final assessment order has been passed till this date. We have gone through the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondents. We do not […]

Fraudulent Claim of ITC of ₹9.97 crores: HC grants Bail to Accused

April 18, 2022 780 Views 0 comment Print

The allegation against applicant is that he and a co-accused have set up a number of fictitious companies, which are being used for the purposes of defrauding the government. It is contented that the accused persons have opened banks accounts in fictitious names and provided their telephone numbers and email addresses in this respect.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031