State of Rajasthan Through Chief Engineer Vs Godhara Construction Company (Rajasthan High Court) It is not in dispute that the arbitral award was passed on 29.07.2000 and the objections were filed by the appellant-State of Rajasthan under Section 34 of the Act of 1996 on 21.11.2000. It is an admitted position of law that the […]
Case of the prosecution is that the applicant is a Chartered Accountant and Company Secretary engaged in the profession of teaching students who aspire to become Chartered Accountant. The complainant is the Managing Director of a Coaching Institute for CA and CS titled as J.K. Shah Education Private Limited.
Refund was allowable to assessee alongwith the interest on delayed refund as the officer arbitrarily and illegally withheld the amount of refund despite the order of the first appellate authority dated 30.06.2018 for refund.
Chandrasekaran Ragupati Vs CBDT (Madras High Court) It is the admitted case on the part of the Revenue that, on the last date i.e., on 11.06.2021, which was given to the petitioner to reply ie., upto which the web portal of the respondent was not functioning because of technical glitches. This has been admitted by […]
Section 56 of the U.P. VAT Act would reveal that the section has wide power, but seeking of permission by the assessing authority for making reassessment of the dealer is not conferred under the said provision.
Vijay Baid @ Vicky Vs Union of India (Chhattisgarh High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that pursuant to arrest made by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) on 01.05.2021 of two persons at Railway Station- Raipur, DRI further searched the house of petitioner on the same date and have seized gold bar, silver […]
R.Barathbaran (Died) Vs R. Nallathambi (Madras High Court) There is no mandatory provision under the Negotiable Instruments Act that both the signature and thump impression has to be obtained for a pro-note and the lower Appellate Judge has totally misguided and misused the provision of the Negotiable Instruments Act, regarding burden of proof and not […]
Kiran Infra Engineers Limited Vs Northern Railway (Delhi High Court) The question as to whether the supplementary agreement is a full and final discharge of respective obligations under the principal agreement and also rescinds the terms and conditions of the principal agreement is itself in dispute, which requires to be referred to Arbitral Tribunal. The […]
State of Odisha Vs Nayagarh Sugar Complex Ltd (Orissa High Court) The agreement provides for exclusion of representations and There are recitals in connection with or in relation to representations or warranties in mentioning Government of Odisha as substantial share holder in the seller and having had acted through Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Department of […]
Gold Bricks Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Vs Atit Agrawal (Chhattisgarh High Court) The order of the Appellate Tribunal is for appointment of Architect and make an inspection in respect of development carried out. The order further contains to decide the quantum of infrastructure/ user charges in absence of agreement and thereafter to decide the modus of […]
