Goel Road Carriers Private Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) HC noted the fact that refund has been adjusted against the outstanding tax demand by the Authority without following the due procedure prescribed under Section 245 inasmuch as no notice or opportunity of pre-decisional hearing had been provided to the petitioner prior to such adjustment […]
Voluntary statements cannot constitute pre-show cause notice consultation as envisaged in the paragraph 5 of the 2017 Master Circular.
In view of the apparent damage to the petitioning assessee’s manufacturing facility, a moratorium for a period of two months is granted. That is to say that the payment that was due in April, 2022 will not be deemed to have been defaulted and the payment due in May, 2022 need not be paid by the 15th day of this month.
Court is of the view that the delay of one day in asking for an adjournment should not have led to closure of the right to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice.
Impugned order under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act was issued on April 1, 2022 without taking the petitioner’s response to the initial notice into consideration.
Puja Vs PCIT (Punjab and Haryana High Court) Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-Income Tax Department, and seeks time to file reply. Prima facie, the impugned order dt. 03.04.2022, passed under Section 148 (A)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 appears to have been passed with regard to a […]
The F.I.R. states the number of Santro car. Merely one of the witnesses has said that he has given the deposition by signing the document without reading and he was not much aware about which car has caused the accident, is not that much fatal.
That the petitioner as a transgender has every right to choose her gender and accordingly, she has submitted her application for grant of family pension under Section 56(1) of Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992.
Shri Sai Co-Operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) In the present case, though the petitioner responded to the show cause notice, yet it could not provide all the relevant details and documents, as the time period of three days to respond to the show cause notice was inadequate. Consequently, this […]
Om Prakash Kumawat Vs Rekha Kumawat (Rajasthan High Court) In case of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited , the Apex Court, after appreciating Sections 35 & 37 of the SARFAESI Act, held that arbitration proceedings and proceedings under the SARFAESI Act can be resorted to simultaneously Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners that in view […]
