Nand Kishore Rai Vs Central Bureau of Investigation (Calcutta High Court) The accused persons were given benefit of doubt, as the prosecution failed to inquire the witness and also failed to produce necessary books of accounts. Facts- The appellants, Nand Kishore Rai and his wife Smt. Bandana. Rai, were found guilty to the charge under […]
Kshipra Jatana Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) This Court is of the view that the restrictive stay order dated 11th March, 2020 issued by the Respondents granting stay to the petitioner only till 30th September, 2020 is in violation of the directions of the CBDT as well as previous orders of this Court wherein it […]
SMJ Eximp Limited Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) It is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of intimation of the fact that the assessee is not existing, still respondent is proceeding with the impugned reassessment proceeding and submits that the whole proceeding and the impugned notice and assessment order […]
Dynasoure Concrete Treatment Private Limited Vs Chairman, GSTN (Calcutta High Court) In this writ petition the petitioners have made a very innocuous prayer of direction upon the Chairman, Goods and Service Tax Network/respondent No. 1 to consider its representation dated 3rd May, 2022 seeking amendment in GSTIN by one recipient in GSTR-1 filed for the […]
Goods which are subject to nil rate of cess would be construed as exempt supplies for purposes of formula prescribed Rule 89 (4) of CGST Rules
Shakti Oil And Chemical Co Vs Commissioner of DGST Delhi (Delhi High Court) According to Mr Babbar, the powers to seal under Section 67(4) of the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act,2017/Central Goods and Service Tax, 2017 are confined to the fact and situation adverted to in the said provision. Mr Satyakam, on the other […]
Toshiba Corporation Vs CIT (Delhi High Court) Admittedly, while deciding the stay application, the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) have to consider three primary issues i.e. prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury. In the present case, the petitioner has not claimed financial hardship. Accordingly, the third factor i.e. irreparable injury is not […]
Punjab and Haryana High Court affirms ITAT’s decision on Anil Kumar’s appeal, upholding the assessment. Court rejects challenge on grounds of different treatment for 2014-15.
Baxter India Private Limited Vs Addl. CIT (Delhi High Court) 1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned assessment order dated 31st March, 2022 passed for the Assessment Year 2016-17 under Section 147 read with Sections 144 & 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’) as well as demand notice […]
Phoenix Contact India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports) (Delhi High Court) Despite the correction having been permitted, the refund of IGST was not granted to the petitioner. The petitioner has remained engaged with the respondent/revenue in this regard since October, 2018. Because there was no movement in the matter, the petitioner was propelled […]
