Explore the Delhi High Court judgment in Davinder Singh Thapar vs. ACIT, highlighting the invalidity of notices against a deceased assessee under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
Dive into the Jharkhand High Court rejection of bail for Hemant Kumar Sinha in a money laundering case. Analysis of charges, arguments, and legal perspectives.
Held that If there is payment of tax under the composition scheme, question of regular assessment would not arise under Telangana Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (TVAT Act).
P.R. Mani Air Fridge & Electronics Vs Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Madras High Court) Heard Mr. N. Muralikumaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V. Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel for R1. There is no appearance for R2. 2. Both learned counsel will concur on the position that identically placed petitioners […]
Explore the Calcutta High Court ruling on PCIT vs Organon, examining the delay condonation application. Legal insights, precedents, and implications for income tax appeals.
HC held that this Court while exercising jurisdiction under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act cannot be called upon to reexamine the facts or to re-appreciate the tenor and ambit of the document which was placed before the Assessing Officer, CITA and more importantly the Tribunal has noted that the assessee has failed to establish the reimbursement which was pleaded by producing document despite opportunity being given at the appellate stage.
Calcutta High Court quashes IT notice against Tinplate Company, citing change of opinion in assessing officer approach. Detailed analysis and implications.
Explore the ACIT Vs Zodiac Transport case as ITAT Delhi directs fresh adjudication on protective additions, influenced by the SVP Group entities recent partial relief.
Meghalaya High Court orders the setting aside of a Section 148 notice due to procedural lapses, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to the mandated seven-day response period.
The assessee gave additional discount to parties on account of godown rent paid by the said parties. According to the assessee, the customers did not take the delivery of the goods in their own godown after the purchase and the goods would continue to be at the godown of the assessee till the customer sells the goods to the other parties.
