PCIT Vs Emarsso Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) The learned Counsel for the Appellant-Revenue present in Court states that Advocate who filed the appeals is no longer on the panel of the Department and they seek time to take instructions as to who will be assigned with the matter and to file vakalatnama. 2. […]
Kamal Chand Bothra Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. arising out of F. No.DGGI/INT/INTL/668/2022/-Gr-A-O/o ADG-DGGI-JZU-JAIPUR; Registered at Directorate General Of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Jaipur Zonal Office, Jaipur relating to offence punishable under Sections 132 (1) of Central Goods and Services […]
Atlas Pvc Pipes Limited Vs State of Odisha (Orissa High Court) It is ex facie clear from the copy of Memo of Appeal in Form GST APL-01 vide Annexure-2 series to the writ petition that having received the Order passed under Section 74 of the OGST Act on 20.01.2021, the Petitioner filed the appeal invoking […]
Madras HC quashes assessment orders against Anantham Retail Pvt. Ltd. for tax years 2019-22. Violation of natural justice cited. Learn more.
Respondent submitted that the show cause notice issued was on the basis of the balance sheet wherein all activities of the assessee were truly declared. Therefore, there was no suppression of material facts.
Assistant Commissioner of Customs Vs Mahadev Enterprises (Madras High Court) The simple prayer in the writ petition is to direct the appellants to permit the respondent to re-export the goods, namely, Unflavored Supari (Betelnut Product) and to issue a ‘Detention Certificate’ for waiver of demurrage and container detention charges. The respondent imported Betelnut Product with […]
The Madras High Court rules that IBC proceedings cannot affect the rights of the Income Tax Department to reopen assessments.
Baker Hughes Asia Pacific Limited Vs Union Of India (Rajasthan High Court) HC held that that the circular dated 31.03.2020, being a subordinate legislation, is repugnant and conflicting to the parent legislation i.e. Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act and hence, the same cannot be applied to oust the legitimate claim for accumulated ITC refund […]
Powers under Section 9 of the A& C Act cannot be invoked by the competent Court prior to the termination of the conciliation proceedings under the MSMED Act.
There cannot be any justification for the ONGC to withhold any amount on the premise that it has a claim of unliquidated damages against the petitioner
