PEETEE Coach Builders Private Limited Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) The petitioner has challenged the impugned show cause notice dated 15.12.2020 of the 4th respondent on the ground that the impugned notice is contrary to the circular No.52/26/2018-GST, dated 09.08.2018 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), Central Board […]
Delay in Filing of Appeal beyond period of 1 month condoned as Cancellation of Registration would affect the livelihood and violate Article 21 of Constitution
Gujarat HC directed department to grant refund of IGST already paid by the assessee on the amount of ocean freight charges.
Reopening the assessment under section 148(2), by officer having no jurisdiction over the appellant, vitiate the entire reassessment proceedings initiated against the appellant.
More than adequate opportunities to complete the disciplinary proceedings arising from Departmental Charge Sheet dated 16.07.2015 had been granted by the CAT firstly in 2016, and then again in 2020. Extension rightly not granted
Suraj Singh Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) GST: Calcutta High Court Directs Assistant Commissioner To Grant Personal Hearing Before Passing Order Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Asansol Charge, dated 9th March, 2022 on the […]
Indus Technical Education Society Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) So far as unsecured loan of Rs. 28,53,439/ is concerned, the petitioner could not submit any credible evidence alongwith its reply to establish credit worthiness of the lender i.e. M/s Arrow Netmart Pvt. Ltd. Therefore, prima facie, the Assessing Authority had some relevant material […]
Power under Section 9 could only be exercised for preservation of the subject matter of the dispute till the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal and scope of relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Act could not be extended for directing specific performance of the contract.
Agrawal Petrolium Co. Vs PCIT (Madhya Pradesh High Court) The main grievance put forth is that when petitioner received a notice under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, the petitioner filed a reply on 15.03.2022 but the same was not considered by the respondent. Learned counsel for the parties by placing reliance on para-3 and […]
Chit funds are liable to pay service tax only after amendment to definition of word ‘service’ brought in i.e., wef 15-6-2015 as held by SC in UOI v. Margadarshi Chit Funds (P.) Ltd.
