Cochin University of Science and Technology Vs DR. P. V. SASIKUMAR (Kerala High Court) The Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009, widened the definition of ’employee’ under the Act in order to extend the benefit to the teachers with effect from the date on which the provisions of the Act were made applicable to educational […]
R N Fashion Vs Union of India And Ors (Calcutta High Court) In this case reply was uploaded online by the assessee on 21st March, 2022 and the time limit for filing the reply in terms of notice expired on 18th March, 2022 which was a public holiday and the following two days namely, 19th […]
Held that the act of University in granting affiliation to a private college is service in furtherance of providing education and accordingly the affiliation fees collected is exempted from service tax.
Telangana HC remands the case to decide on IGST applicability in Ola’s passenger transportation services, challenging an order for CGST and SGST payment.
P C Financial Services Private Limited Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) 1. Present application has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 31st May, 2022 passed by this Court by relying on the order dated 31st May, 2022 passed by a learned Single Judge of […]
Urmila Vs Income Tax Officer (Rajasthan High Court) the very substantial point which has been raised by the petitioners that one single cash deposit of Rs.34,01,000/- has been taken as two different transactions, which according to the petitioners is factually incorrect and not borne out from any of the record including transactions made as entered […]
PCIT Vs Kumar Builders Consortium (Bombay High Court) Revenue argued that Section 80IB(10), does not at all envisage a pro rata deduction, in respect of eligible fats. In other words, it is suggested that even if a single flat in a housing project is found to exceed the permissible maximum built-up area of 1500 sq.ft., […]
Accepting the statement of the assessee that the addition be restricted to only profit element on the purchases efected by it, the CIT(A), restricted the addition by estimating profit of 12.5% on the total purchases in question.
Revenue can set off/adjust amount to be refunded against the sum which remains payable under Income Tax Act by the person to whom the refund is due, after giving an intimation in writing
Respondent furnished inaccurate particulars of his income in the garb of fictitious cash sales with a view to claim Section 81-IC exemption
