Due to technical fault in Income Tax portal notices were issued to a different e-mail address & same cannot be treated as service of Notice
Return was filed under the new PAN and in spite of that, assessing officer passed assessment order under old PAN – HC Quashed such order
Singh Group Vs State Of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) GST Registration cancellation orders: Once the Government exercised its powers and reached a satisfaction (that there were defects on the common GST portal with respect to service of orders) and, provided relaxation of limitation, by suspending the period of limitation with respect to orders passed up […]
Appellant is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in allegedly recovering tax without issuance of any order under Section 74(9) of GST
Upon remittance of pre-deposit of 10%, balance remain stayed and hence no justification for continuation of the bank attachments.
Held that action of Designated Committee by first deducting the amount of deposit made by petitioners during enquiry, investigation or audit and, thereafter, extending relief to the petitioners by computing the amount of tax due on the outstanding amount, is not as per the mandate of the Scheme.
Held that application u/s 7 for triggering CIRP may be initiated by a financial creditor either individually or jointly with other financial creditors with total minimum threshold for initiation of CIRP being fixed at INR 1 Crore.
Challenge in writ petition before Punjab and Haryana High Court was to Notice under section 148 and subsequent order under section 148-A(d) as well as CBDT Instructions No.1 of 2022 dated 11.05.2022.
Explore the Jharkhand High Court’s ruling in AMI Enterprises vs Union of India on GST transit violation and procedural infirmities.
Bombay High Court stayed proceedings under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15. Initial notice was issued after time limit expired
