Punjab & Haryana High Court in GST fraud case granted the bail as no serious apprehension has been expressed by the prosecution of the petitioners being flight risks, or that they would tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses
HC Held that in the present case the department vide Form GST DRC-09 issued communication to the bank to recover the due from the petition u/s 79 without issuance of notice u/s 74(1) and without giving opportunity of being heard is not proper.
Section 148A notices of Income Tax are time barred for Assessment year (A.Y.) 2017-18, Rajasthan High Court Stays the operation of the Notice
Held that undisputedly the appellant has made payment of both service tax and also GST. Further, service tax invoices were subsequently cancelled by issuing credit note. Hence, refund of service tax available to the assessee.
Ved Prakash Mittal Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 29th July, 2022, relating to the assessment year 2014-2015 on the ground that the same being without jurisdiction and being barred by limitation since the […]
Value Added Tax (VAT) Act Cannot Be Amended After Introduction Of CGST Act, 2017 – State Tax Officer & Anr Vs. Baiju A.A (Kerala High Court)
Hemant Gokhru vs. UOI & Ors (Rajasthan High Court) Learned Senior Counsel Shri Balia assisted by Shri Priyansh Arora submits that as per first proviso to Section 149 of the Income Tax Act, the impugned notice dated 22.7.2022 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 for the assessment year 2014-2015 is without jurisdiction because it […]
Held that Chuni which is the by-product of Dal, it is one of the 16 ingredients into the making of cattle feed, and it is not the same thing as cattle feed. Chuni is not Cattle feed and therefore not amenable to Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999.
Held that record doesn’t disclose any independent material, accordingly charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act cannot be confirmed merely on the basis of the retracted confessional statement.
PCIT Vs Britannia Industries Limited (Calcutta High Court) The short issue involved in this case is whether the Commissioner could have invoked his power under Section 263 of the Act on the ground that the Assessing Officer did not conduct proper enquiry. We need not labour much to decide this issue as the learned Tribunal […]
